Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eli's avatar

As I read the Caitlin Moran piece, part of it seems like ostentatious vice-signaling? To be sure, some of that is self-deprecating jokes (Crocs for funerals, the threat to rifle through medicine cabinets while using the toilet as a guest) but some of it is clearly deliberately ignoring what seems like gentle feedback that her house is less pleasant to visit than it could be, including for her (presumably older) mother-in-law. It's very odd! I have never been a homeowner and haven't given kitchen remodels any thought, but I think I am now radicalized into support for downstairs bathrooms.

But perhaps it's relevant that British homes are on average smaller than North American ones? Maybe for Moran the downstairs closet really is *the only* place for coats and shoes? And then I wonder if perhaps there's an unspoken "well, we don't have that many people over these days anyway" that might be embarrassing for someone who refers often to going to parties (and having three distinct pairs of Crocs for the purpose) to admit.

Mario Rustan's avatar

I had an unexpected debate with my mother about a slightly open toilet's door in a Swedish restaurant in Singapore.

Growing up in a postcolonial home, she believed that toilets should be away from eyes and minds, in this small restaurant it should have been mistaken as a panel or a closet.

Meanwhile, I was glad the slightly open door signaled availability, being an owner of an unpredictable tummy. After all, the room in question was clean, dry, and equipped (Toto bidet, as you like).

I thought the debate was about different values between generations, on letting others know if the loo is available, or keeping them guessing.

Now I think the debate might also to do with class perception, as Laura Lupin Howard mentioned.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?